Fotografija

[Milos_kg]

Cestitam, Bajker, odlicna kombinacija.

Sent from my Sony device

[trojanac]

Odlično, svaka čast!

[Paja]

Dex šta ti paše od starih stakala?
L sigurno paše, a onaj zoom?

[BAJKER]

Sve sto imam pase dakle 17-40L, 50 1.8, i 70-300

[Paja]

Odlično. Sad si miran dok Zu ne odluči da proda Sony.

[BAJKER]

A taj film necu gledati.

[Paja]

Nije na film. Digitalni je.

[BAJKER]

[Floyd]

Padanje u nesvest koliko je dobar. Dva dana sam išao u Mediamarkt dok se nisam odlučio i ipak sam uzeo A5100. Za dlaku A6000, ali jednostavno je preveliki i patio bih za tačom više nego za tražilom i papučicom za blic.

Već sam počeo da puštam buve o prodaji Nikona i objektiva. I ovako sam ga jedva koristio, a sad tek neću kad sam se opremio ovako sa Sony-jem.

Umal' da zaboravim. Snimanje filmova sa tačom - prajsles.

Hvala

U pravu si za a6000 da je prevelik. 3 i 5 imaju idealne dimenzije

Ajd i ja da kazem koju Ponovio sam se sa Canon-om 5DMKII i objektivom 50mm 1.8

Čestitam

[BAJKER]

Hvala Floyde

[zuzazu]

Evo, i ja cestitam.

Svi ste se ponovili sem mene

Ja jurim ovog Samyanga 12mm f2,0. Moram Nidzi da odam priznanje na ideji.

Turio sam u oglase Manfrotto tripod sa glavom, a turicu i ovde, pa sto kaze Bajker, ako nekomu treba...

[zuzazu]

Što?

Desire 500 via Tapatalk

Canon 50mm f1,4 je ubedljivo zasrano prajm staklo Canona. Kompletno je mutan, neostar i sto kazu ovi na zapadu - "mushy". Na 1,4 je neupotrebljiv, mora debelo da se pritvori da bi se pokazao a onda se postavlje pitanje a sto ne plastic-fantastic ili nesto trece?

Ima lep bokeh sto nije ni cudo kad je sav ko na buckalo fatan pa je "razmazan".

Od tri 50mm koje Canon pravi u rangu od 100 do 1000 i kusur evra ovaj je ubedljivo najgori.

Njegovi rodjaci 85mm 1,8 i 100mm 2,0 su sasvim druga prica.

[nidza]

Moje iskustvo je drugačije, tj. koliko para toliko muzike kod Canonskih 50 ica.


Tapatalk

[trojanac]

A 50 1,2?

Desire 500 via Tapatalk

[zuzazu]

The Best Bang For Your Buck – The “Nifty-Fifty”

I would say that if you are just starting out and you want a 50mm prime lens, get the Canon 50mm f/1.8 II. At around $125, the 50mm 1.8 is a real bargain and it can do 95% of what the 50mm 1.4 can.

The One to Avoid – The “Shifty Fifty”

It goes without saying that the Canon 50mm f/1.4 is simply not worth the 3-4x cost of the 50mm f/1.8.

Even though it has a maximum aperture of f/1.4, its overly soft image quality at wide open nullifies that extra half stop advantage. And if you stop down to f/1.8 or f/2.0, then there really not enough aesthetic difference in appearance to the 50mm f/1.8.

The Best Overall 50mm Lens – The “Gimme! Fifty”

The Canon 50mm f/1.2L is without a doubt the best 50mm prime lens from Canon. When you want a 50mm for low light, for ultra low depth of field, and for shots that you would not be able to get otherwise from the other 50’s, then save up your money, skip the 50mm 1.4 and just jump straight to the Canon 50mm f/1.2L.

At around $1600 bucks, it is far more expensive than the other two 50mm primes, but at least it does a lot more as well. It is actually sharp and usable when wide open and it can open up a full stop brighter than the 1.8. This prime lens gives you more creamy bokeh and just more bokeh in general

http://www.slrlounge.com/school/canon-50mm-prime/

http://kenrockwell.com/canon/comparison ... lenses.htm

DxO

Lab report

Starting with overall scores, the f/1.8 scored two points higher than the f/1.4. Chromatic aberrations were lower on the f/1.8 although the actual resolution was 63 lp/mm for the f/1.4 and 59 lp/mm for the f/1.8. In vignetting, chromatic aberrations, light transmission and distortion, the 50mm f/1.8 edged out the 50mm f/1.4.

http://www.adorama.com/alc/0012817/arti ... f18-or-f14

Svaki uporedni test na internetu, manje - vise ce reci isto sto je ovde gore postovano.